Климатическая психология. Как добиться устойчивого развития - Кали Андерссон

d’Adda, G., Capraro, V. & Tavoni, M. (2017). Push, don’t nudge: Behavioral spillovers and policy instruments. Economics Letters, 154, 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.02.029

Domíngueza, J. & Rojas, J. L. (2013). Presumed consent legislation failed to improve organ donation in Chile. Transplantation Proceedings. 45, 4, 1316–1317.

Ghesla, C., Grieder, M. & Schmitz, J. (2019). Nudge for good? Choice defaults and spillover effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00178

Hagman, W. (2018). When are nudges acceptable?: Influences of beneficiaries, techniques, alternatives and choice architects. Linköping: Linköpings universitet. doi:10.3384/diss.diva-152788

Hagmann, D., Ho, E. H. & Loewenstein, G. (2019). Nudging out support for a carbon tax. Nature Climate Change, 9, 484–489.

Kurz, V. (2017). Essays on behavioral economics: Nudges, food consumption and procedural fairness. Diss. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

Mayer, F. S. (2018). Transforming psychological worldviews to confront climate change. A clearer vision, a different path. U.o.: University of California Press.

Poortinga, W. (2017). Results of a field experiment to reduce coffee cup waste. Summary report to Bewley’s Tea & Coffee UK Ltd. Cardiff: Welsh School of Architecture & School of Psychology, Cardiff University.

Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 2–3.

Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Wynes, S. m.fl. (2018). Measuring what works: Quantifying greenhouse gas emission reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use. Environmental Research Letters, 13, (11). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7

Borgmästaren i Bogota: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2004/03/academic-turns-city-into-a-social-experiment/

cebritas: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/03/zebras-in-the-streets/513836/

Fördjupad analys av svensk klimatstatistik 2018: http://www. naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer 6400/978-91620-6848-6.pdf?pid=23767

Organdonationer: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ruth-green/organ-donation_b_3886766.html?guccounter=1&guce_ referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_ referrer_sig=AQAAAF_Luz4CbrTlRoKsv2OxWiwKd57H Lo5Lj4mpgexROIKhPyAPmu47yAh0WQJhyh69_NzCr_ qCzxg1VGbUfn7AG7NAYpUJpWT_e647m0PyXXDTX bXKGYdI3yBPlPaQ2o_7fKIqybGyp18FzeON7mj-e1IfW ZT1sWCnGX7GzrdYdHy

Växthusgaser, utsläppsnivåer: https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Sa-mar-miljon/Statistik-A-O/Vaxthusgaser-konsumtionsbase rade-utslapp-per-person/?fbclid=IwAR1XQQrLOi5q6n7xzINy 2tQzDtsOV0h6VcgWvgIgIKxJF0bo28phic1A8K8

Как выбрать метод и не попасть в ловушку

Aarons, G. A. & Sommerfeld, D. H. (2012). Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 51 (4). doi:10.1016/j. jaac.2012.01.018

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E. & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. New York: Pearson.

Daniels, A. C. (2000). Bringing out the best in people: How to apply the astonishing power of positive reinforcement. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hasson, H. & von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2017). Användbar evidens: Om följsamhet och anpassningar. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.

Hasson, H., Andersson, M. & Bejerholm, U. (2011). Barriers in implementation of evidence-based practice: Supported employment in Swedish context. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 25 (3), 332–345. doi:10.1108/14777261111143563

Kahneman, D. (2012). Tänka snabbt och långsamt. Stockholm: Volante.

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M. & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

Plath, D. (2014). Implementing evidence-based practice: an organizational perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 905–923. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs169

Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Thyer, B. A. & Pignotti, M. (2011). Evidence-based practices do not exist. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39 (4), 328–33. doi 10.1007/s10615-011-0358-x

von Thiele Schwarz, U., Lundmark, R. & Hasson, H. (2016). The dynamic integrated evaluation model (DIEM): Achieving sustainability in organizational health interventions: Advances in evaluation methodology. Stress and Health, 32 (4), 285–293.

От документов – к действию

Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climate Change, 114 (2), 169–188.

Dietz, T., Dan, A. & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72 (2), 185–214.

Energikontor Sydost (2018). En populärversion av Resevaneundersökningen. Älmhults kommun och Älmhultbostäder, 2018. Växjö: Energikontor Sydost.

Grothmann, T. & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (3), 199–213.

Haden, V. R. m.fl. (2012). Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change? PLoS One, 7 (12).

Harada, K. & Yoshio, N. (2015). Promotion of physical activity guidelines and behavior change, Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine, 4 (1), 9–15.

Jones, C., Hine, D. W. & Marks, A. D. G. (2017). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis, 37, 331–341. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/risa.12601

Krosnick, J. A. m.fl. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climate Change 77 (1–2), 7–43.

Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery and values. Climate Change, 77, (1–2), 45–72.

Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17 (3), 445–459. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004

Naturvårdsverket (2019). Miljöledning i staten 2018. En redovisning. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.

Roser-Renouf, C. & Nisbet, M. C. (2008). The measurement of key behavioral science constructs in climate change research. International Journal of Sustainability Communication, 3, 37–95.

Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42 (6), 1273–1285. doi:10.1068/a42282

Singh, A. S. m.fl. (2017). The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 73, 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.011

Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29 (3), 309–317. doi:10.1016/j. jenvp.2008.10.004

Stevely, A. K. m.fl. (2018). Exposure to revised drinking guidelines and ‘COM-B’ determinants of behaviour change: descriptive analysis of a monthly cross-sectional survey in England, BMC Public Health, 18, 251.

Wallace-Wells, D. (2019). The uninhabitable earth. London: Allen Lane.

Weber, E. U. & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66 (4), 315.

Asppollen på marken: https://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel. aspx?programid=91&artikel=7224699

Ärtor i frysdisken: https://www.gp.se/ekonomi/d%C3%A4rf%C3%B6r-%C3%A4r-det-slut-p%C3%A5%C3%A4rtor-i-frysdisken-1.15974879

Измерять, проверять и корректировать

Arnold, O. m.fl. (2018). Capturing the environmental impact of individual lifestyles: Evidence of the criterion validity of the general ecological behavior scale. Environment and Behavior, 50 (3), 350–372. doi:10.1177/0013916517701796